Startups & Creator Economy · Chicago & National

Chicago Startup Attorney
Founder-friendly.

The two most expensive legal mistakes a startup makes are not having a co-founder agreement before the first dispute and not having IP assignment agreements signed before raising a round. Lysinski & Associates P.C. works with early-stage founders on fixed-fee scopes — formation, co-founder agreements, SAFEs, cap table equity — with an equity fee option for founders who are building before they are funded.

Fixed fees for defined scopes. Equity fee option available at discretion. Creator economy contracts across all verticals.

Founder-friendly fixed fees

LLC or Delaware C-Corp formationfrom $500
Co-founder agreementfrom $750
SAFE documentationfrom $500
NDAfrom $350

All "from" prices reflect Adam's drafting work only — plus state filing fees, registered-agent fees, and other third-party costs. Final scope is confirmed in the engagement letter before any work begins.

Equity fee optionavailable
(773) 777-9888

The Practice

The two mistakes
that kill startups legally.

The first is not having a co-founder agreement before the first dispute. The second is not having IP assignment agreements signed before raising a round. Both are inexpensive to address at formation and ruinously expensive to address after a falling-out or an investor due diligence request.

Adam works with early-stage founders who are building real businesses. The engagement starts with a triage call where he understands the business, the cap table, the funding path, and the operational structure. The legal work follows from that understanding, not from a template generator.

The creator economy practice is a natural extension of startup work: creators are solo founders whose IP is themselves. Brand deals, music agreements, modeling contracts, and AI-generated content rights all require an attorney who understands that the creator’s name and likeness are the business asset — not incidental to it.

Illinois HB 4875 amends the Right of Publicity Act to expand enforcement rights and remedies — including for recording artists — when an individual's voice, likeness, or identity is used in AI-generated content; specific application turns on the statutory definitions and commercial-purpose framing. This area is the most active part of the creator economy practice in 2026.

Scope of work

  • Entity formation (LLC, C-Corp)
  • Co-founder agreements
  • IP assignment agreements
  • SAFEs and convertible instruments
  • Cap table equity planning
  • Brand deal and endorsement contracts
  • Music and sync licensing agreements
  • FTC disclosure compliance
  • AI digital replica rights (HB 4875)

Cross-practice

When the startup deploys AI in operations or hiring, AI Law obligations attach. When it grows, General Counsel retainer structure becomes more efficient than transaction-by-transaction billing.

Why Adam advises startups and creators

AIGP credential matters for AI-startup founders specifically — co-founder agreements that anticipate HB 3773 and BIPA, IP assignments that handle prompt-engineered output, training-data ownership clauses, and vendor-contract structures built for AI products.

Adam has obtained licenses in Illinois, Wisconsin, New York, Texas, Minnesota, D.C., and 7 federal courts* — covering founders forming an Illinois operating entity with Delaware C-Corp parent, plus relocations and remote teams across the listed jurisdictions.

Creator-economy practice handles the work most generic startup attorneys refer out: music streaming royalty contracts, influencer agreements with FTC compliance, brand-deal negotiations, and content rights for short-form video creators.

Former service on the Illinois ARDC Hearing Board means Adam can structure co-founder agreements and equity grants with the conduct-review framework most likely to survive disputes years later.

AI-startup formation: what changes from day one

Forming an AI startup in Illinois in 2026 is not the same as forming a typical SaaS startup five years ago. The compliance surface starts on day one, not at growth stage. AI-startup founders need to think about Illinois HB 3773 the moment they hire their first employee using any AI-assisted screening tool, BIPA the moment they integrate any biometric processing, AI vendor contracts the moment they sign their first OpenAI or Anthropic API agreement, and training-data ownership the moment a co-founder generates the first prompt-engineered output.

Co-founder agreements drafted for traditional SaaS startups frequently miss what matters in AI: ownership of fine-tuned models, ownership of prompt libraries and chains, allocation of risk on training-data IP claims, indemnification for downstream model outputs, and equity treatment for the co-founder who brings a research thesis versus the co-founder who brings the code.

AIGP credential matters for AI-startup founders because the legal stack is different. Vendor contracts have AI-specific clauses (data-processing rights, model-update obligations, output indemnity). Employment agreements need HB 3773 disclosure language. IP assignments need to handle prompt-engineered output and fine-tuned models distinct from baseline IP assignment. Adam handles these from formation, not as a retrofit later.

AI law is rapidly evolving. The framework above describes the current Illinois compliance landscape as of 2026; specific terms in any agreement are tailored to the company’s technology stack, jurisdiction, and risk profile.

Why this practice is different at Lysinski & Associates P.C.

For AI startups, Adam's AIGP credential (IAPP) means founder agreements drafted with awareness of AI-specific issues: ownership of training data, IP assignment for prompt-engineered output, BIPA-compliant data collection, HB 3773 compliance from day one, and indemnification structures that anticipate the inversion of vendor risk that AI tools have created. Few Chicago startup attorneys hold this credential.

As a former Illinois ARDC Hearing Board Judge, a former Illinois Licensed Managing Real Estate Broker, and a Certified Mediator with multi-state license (IL, WI, NY, TX, MN, D.C.*), Adam brings disciplinary-grade judgment to founder agreements and the multi-jurisdictional fluency that creator-economy and AI-startup founders need when their work crosses state lines from inception. Adam personally handles every founder-stage matter — no associate handoffs.

Adam holds the IAPP AIGP credential.

Equity, financing,
and founder economics.

Avoidable legal risk in an early-stage company often arises from how founder equity, employee equity, intellectual property, and investor instruments are handled at the start. Much of that work is squarely legal; several of the items below also carry tax consequences, and on those Adam works alongside your CPA or tax advisor rather than in place of one. The areas below are technical, fact-specific, and governed by rules that change — this section describes the kinds of issues founders should be aware of, not the specific deadlines, rates, thresholds, or elections that apply to a given company. Those must be confirmed against current law and your facts, with qualified counsel and your tax advisor, before you act.

Founder restricted stock and the 83(b) election

When founders or early team members receive restricted stock subject to vesting, a Section 83(b) election can change how and when that equity is taxed. The filing window is short and strict — generally 30 days from the transfer of the stock, with no extensions — so the decision and the filing have to be handled correctly and promptly. This is a tax election: Adam handles the underlying restricted-stock and vesting paperwork and coordinates timing with your tax advisor, who confirms whether and how to file. Other equity structures — such as RSUs, unexercised options, and early-exercise arrangements — raise different issues and should be reviewed separately. Confirm the current rules and procedure with your tax advisor before acting.

Vesting, IP, cap tables, and option pools

Founder vesting, an option pool sized for early hires, and a clean capitalization table are central to what investor due diligence reviews, and vesting documents commonly address what happens to unvested equity on a change of control. Equally important is intellectual property: proprietary information and inventions assignment agreements (PIIAs) should be signed at formation, at each hire, and by any contractor or pre-incorporation contributor, so that code, designs, and other work product are owned by the company rather than by individuals. Unaddressed gaps in any of these — undocumented grants, ambiguous vesting, unassigned IP — are common diligence problems. Adam structures vesting, drafts the equity and IP-assignment documents, and documents the cap table so issues are easier to identify and resolve before a financing. These should be reviewed against the company's governing documents, stock plan, investor documents, and current law before issuance.

Stock options and company valuations

Before granting compensatory stock options, a company generally needs a defensible valuation of its common stock to set the exercise price, and tax rules (under Section 409A) govern how that price and valuation must be handled to avoid adverse tax treatment. Valuations are time-limited and can be affected by later events such as a financing, so they need to be kept current. The choice between incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options also affects eligibility, documentation, and tax treatment. The valuation itself is performed by an independent valuation professional, not by the firm; Adam handles the option-plan and grant documentation and coordinates the corporate implementation with your valuation provider and tax advisor, who confirm valuation and tax treatment. The specific requirements here change — confirm current rules before granting.

QSBS (Qualified Small Business Stock) awareness

For stock in a qualifying C-corporation, Section 1202 can allow noncorporate holders to exclude some or all of the gain on a later sale, subject to holding-period and other requirements. This is an area of active change — federal law was amended in 2025, the rules differ depending on when the stock was acquired, the exclusion and its tax effect can vary with how long the stock is held, and many service businesses — along with certain others, such as financial, farming, hospitality, and extraction businesses — are excluded altogether. Eligibility turns on a number of fact-specific conditions (including how and when the stock was issued, the company's structure and size, how it operates, and events like redemptions and secondary sales), and federal treatment may not match a given state's. QSBS is a tax matter: Adam can structure the entity and stock issuance with QSBS in mind, but whether any stock qualifies, and any actual tax benefit, must be confirmed by your tax advisor under the rules in effect at the time. Do not rely on QSBS treatment, or on the timing of any sale, without that confirmation.

Attorney Advertising. This section describes legal services and provides general information only. It is not individualized legal advice, tax advice, accounting advice, valuation advice, or investment advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. The tax matters described here (including Section 83(b), Section 409A, and Section 1202/QSBS) are technical, fact-specific, and subject to change; nothing here states the deadlines, rates, thresholds, or requirements that apply to a particular company, and all of them must be independently verified against then-current law before any action is taken. Tax elections and valuations are handled in coordination with your qualified tax advisor or valuation professional. Adam Lysinski practices law in Illinois; this content is not an offer to provide legal services in any jurisdiction where he is not authorized to practice.

Frequently Asked

Questions.

Ready to talk?

All calls returned
within 1 business day.

(773) 777-9888

4418 N. Milwaukee Ave., Chicago, IL 60630